Trusted by industry leaders

100x

The lines of code engineers now produce with Cursor

$13B

Stolen in web3 in the past five years

95%

False positive rate of traditional security scanners

91%

Of hacked smart contracts had manual security reviews in 2022

stats

The problem in numbers

Most of the security in web3 today is outsourced to 3rd-party auditors. Traditional security tools have 95% false positive rate.

How are security teams supposed to handle 100x the engineering output that AI coding assistant tools are producing?

It took us 20 seconds to find an issue in Vitalik’s code


…and he paid us a reward for it.

customer-picture
Ash, Founder @ Flexclub
Results were very good! Much better than the previous automated audit we did. Will be implementing most/all of the recommendations ahead of our next contract deployment. Some pretty big issues that we need to address around the Aave integration
customer-picture
Andrew, Security @ Privy
I really thought this tool would be terrible.

Out of the box I would say I am mostly impressed, this is like way above average.
customer-picture
Rob, Security Lead @ Cat Town
I've used a lot of these automated scanners and this is by far the most intelligent one I've used.

I used the migration contract that we're currently having audited by an external partner, and it picked up on a potential division by zero case that wasn't picked up by them.
customer-picture
Andres Gutierrez, CTO @ Agrofi
The quick turnaround time is a game changer. Also, it did catch the vulnerability I mentioned before that I left in some unused code!
customer-picture
Don, Security Lead @ Phantom
These findings are great! I was skimming through the code last night and reached similar conclusions. Having a tool do this automatically is a godsend.